Generics Bulletin is part of Pharma Intelligence UK Limited

This site is operated by Pharma Intelligence UK Limited, a company registered in England and Wales with company number 13787459 whose registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. The Pharma Intelligence group is owned by Caerus Topco S.à r.l. and all copyright resides with the group.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction

UK overturns £90m phenytoin price fines

Executive Summary

Fines totalling almost £90 million (US$120 million) imposed on Pfizer and its marketing partner Flynn Pharma over allegedly unfair UK pricing for phenytoin sodium capsules have been overturned by the country’s Competition Appeal Tribunal. Having invited written submissions, the Tribunal intends to remit the dispute for reconsideration by the UK’s Competition and Markets Authority (CMA).

You may also be interested in...



UK CMA Issues £70m Fines To Pfizer And Flynn Over Phenytoin

After reassessing part of a UK case involving Pfizer and Flynn Pharma over pricing for phenytoin sodium capsules, the country’s competition regulator has reaffirmed that the companies abused their dominant positions to overcharge the NHS and has issued £70m in fines.

CMA Issues £70m Fines To Pfizer And Flynn Over Phenytoin

After reassessing part of a UK case involving Pfizer and Flynn Pharma over pricing for phenytoin sodium capsules, the country’s competition regulator has reaffirmed that the companies abused their dominant positions to overcharge the NHS and has issued £70m in fines.

UK Competition Body Resurrects Claims Against Pfizer And Flynn On Phenytoin Price

After a court last year overturned CMA fines of almost £90m imposed on Pfizer and marketing partner Flynn Pharma over pricing for phenytoin sodium capsules, the UK competition regulator has issued a fresh statement of objections after reassessing the case in light of the ruling’s guidance on how unfair pricing should be evaluated.

Related Content

Latest Headlines
See All
UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

GB000839

Ask The Analyst

Ask the Analyst is free for subscribers.  Submit your question and one of our analysts will be in touch.

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel